Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Grappling With Liability Issues For Entertainment Attorneys

By Stan Soocher
June 01, 2004

Attorneys are faced with a variety of potential liability issues in handling matters for clients. Malpractice insurance can help, but such policies don't eliminate the raising of liability claims. These claims may include disqualification of counsel based on alleged adverse interests of clients, malpractice allegations based on transactional and litigation work and the threat of Rule 11 sanctions.

The entertainment business presents its own lawyer liability concerns. For example, last December, singer Michael Bolton filed a $30 million suit in New York state court alleging conflicts of interest by Weil, Gotshal & Manges, his law firm in a song infringement suit filed against Bolton by the Isley Brothers. (Bolton claims that Weil Gotshal was influenced by his music publisher's insurer, which purportedly paid the firm's fees to go to trial, rather than settle, thus triggering an indemnification provision in Bolton's publishing contract. Bolton lost the infringement suit.)

For transactional lawyers, a fundamental concern is to what extent clients may attribute the results of particular negotiations to the work of their counsel. The Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate Division, Division Seven, recently held that the former owners of Dove Audio failed to present substantial evidence of causation in fact that, if not for the alleged negligence of their lawyers, they would have obtained a better deal when they sold their company. Viner v. Sweet, 117 Cal. App. 4th 1218 (2004).

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?