Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Bad Faith Not Determinative in Deciding Fair Use
In NXVIM Corp. v The Ross Institute, 364 F.3d 471 (2d Cir. 2004), the Second Circuit denied plaintiff's request for a preliminary injunction on “fair use” grounds, even though it was clear that bad faith was present.
Plaintiff NXVIM provided a business-training program called “Executive Success” and developed training material and manuals for the course. The materials had a multitude of copyright notices, and students were required to sign nondisclosure agreements regarding the same. Defendant Rick Ross runs nonprofit Web sites in connection with his work as a cult de-programmer and often provides information to the public about groups that were accused of practicing mind control. Ross commissioned a critique of NXVIM's material, which he received improperly from a past participant in Executive Success. Despite the copyright notices on the manuals, Ross published the critique, which included quotes and sections from the copyrighted manuals. NXVIM sued for infringement, and Ross claimed fair use.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?