Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Enterprise value is the difference between a company's book value and a company's market capitalization. It is a consequence of the difference between value as defined by generally accepted accounting principles and value as defined by investors. Over the past few years, enterprise value has been used as a proxy for intellectual property value. During the market bubble years when market capitalizations were well in excess of book values, IP emerged as the new “must have” high-value asset. Skeptics now suggest that the collapse of the bubble took the air out of patent value. This author and his firm suggest that a requiem commemorating the demise of patent value would be premature. We also suggest that there is good empirical evidence why market-based valuation systems for IP are reasonable.
Post Bubble Market Decline
In the fourth quarter of 2000, the Standard and Poor's 500 (“S&P500″) index, a weighted average of 500 publicly traded companies designed to represent the market as a whole, averaged 1354, and the Brookings Institute noted that the market capitalization of an average company was five to six times greater than its book value. To champions of accounting reform, this was compelling evidence that the accounting system was broken. The fourth quarter of 2000 also marked the 1-year anniversary of the publication of “Rembrandts in the Attic,” and to champions of the knowledge economy, the magnitude of enterprise value was proof that capital markets were recognizing IP's true value.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?