Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On-Site Sales: What Lessor's Counsel Should Know
When equipment lessors evaluate the risks of underwriting lease transactions for manufacturing equipment, one of the primary considerations in the credit decision is the resale value of the equipment in the event of default. In preparing for this risk, a key component of an underwriter's evaluation must be how to access and market the equipment in the event of a default. Therefore, it is critical to look at every transaction from the perspective of how much money a piece of equipment will bring in a sale, if there is an established market for the particular equipment, and also, how and where the equipment can best be marketed and sold if a liquidation is necessary. An often-overlooked and significant factor in this analysis is whether the lessor will have unfettered access to remove the equipment to sell, refurbish, and/or prepare for liquidation at the location where it has been used.
If the lessee is cooperative and agrees to surrender possession of the equipment, there is said to be a “voluntary surrender” or a “friendly foreclosure.” In this amicable setting, the equipment lessor's counsel can focus on presale notices and negotiating terms for release and indemnity, insurance, an auctioneer's contract or the contract with a purchaser, and repayment of the deficiency by the lessee.
Sometimes, however, there will be an interim period after the lessee's default and prior to the sale by contract or auction where the lessee may be given an opportunity to cure the default and enter into a Forbearance Agreement with the lessor. Under these circumstances, it is wise to secure the lessee's consent to a Judgment for Possession in a form that is suitable for filing with the Clerk of Courts and delivery to the sheriff. The most common form of Judgment for Possession traces its foundation to 9-609 (a)(1), which provides in pertinent part that: “After default, a secured party may take possession of the collateral.” [If the governing contract is a true Lease, the statutory basis for a lessor to retake possession of its collateral is Article 2A-525 (6).]
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?