Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Commercial Leasing Law & StrategyKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Proportionate Share Adjustments: Tenants Beware of Costly Calculations

By Douglas J. Danzig
June 01, 2004

Most retail and shopping center leases contain a provision ' which appears fair and reasonable on its face ' to the effect that the tenant's proportionate share of the center or retail area is fixed at a certain percentage, eg, 35%. This percentage is then utilized by the landlord for the purpose of calculating the tenant's contribution to real estate taxes, common area maintenance expenses, and insurance premiums incurred by the landlord in operating the center or building. However, it's not always simple to calculate that share. For example, assume a theater tenant negotiated a lease in a center under construction, which provided that its proportionate share of the center was 35.2%, based upon the detailed plans and specifications for the center then in existence. Upon completion of the center, the tenant was presented with a statement by the landlord advising that the theater occupied 50%. In addition, when the theater tenant was negotiating the lease, it was advised by the landlord that its share of the common area maintenance charges was estimated at approximately $250,000. The bill the tenant received for its share of common area maintenance charges for the first year of operations was approximately $3 million. How could this happen? And how can you prevent this from happening? Read on.

The lease in question provided that the tenant's proportionate share was “35.2% subject to adjustment as provided in Section 2.10.” One might assume that the referenced section would set forth a simple provision to the effect that if the physical size of the center or the size of the theater increased or decreased from that which was set forth in the plans, the tenant's proportionate share would be adjusted accordingly. That certainly would be fair and appropriate. However, what the referenced section contained was a detailed description of what was to be included in the term “Floor Area” for purposes of measuring the size of the center and the size of the theater. The section set forth in great detail what specific areas were to be included and excluded in the measurements. Unfortunately, the definition was far from clear. For example, the lease stated that “in measuring the Floor Area of the center or aggregate rentable portions thereof (including the Leased Premises), there shall be excluded therefrom (i) the square footage area of any Common Areas and project areas, circulation areas, 'back of the house,' kiosks situated in Common Areas, mechanical space and other non-public areas. … ” Other than Common Areas, none of the referenced areas were defined in the lease.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.