Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

What Constitutes a 'Security'?

By Terri L. Weiss
June 22, 2004

The definition of what constitutes a “security” has broadened and changed dramatically over the years under both case and statutory law. Attorneys concentrating in securities law (whether by virtue of litigation or transactional work), as well as governmental and self-regulatory organizations, ranging from the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to the National Association of Securities Dealers (NASD) to various exchanges, have been dealing with the increasingly complex question of what constitutes a “security.” This question is often posed to resolve particular claims in specialized venues, testing the acumen of even the most sophisticated securities practitioners and industry members. Securities can range from simple stock certificates, to grants, to options, to warrants, to stock indices, to certain partnership interests. The list of “securities” is extensive, growing, and in a state of perpetual flux and litigation. No wonder, then, that most matrimonial practitioners lacking expertise in this arcane field can run into significant difficulties and delays in arranging for the equitable distribution of assets that may well be considered “securities” by the relevant financial institutions, their counsel and/or their in-house compliance staff, even when the matrimonial practitioner is not at all certain that those assets are indeed “securities.” This two-part article describes the transfer process and offers sample forms as examples.

Introduction

Not surprisingly, financial institutions — just like nearly all other entities – seek to protect themselves as much as possible from potential liability, including regulatory and litigation hazards, by refusing to transfer what could be deemed to be “securities” without proper authorization, documentation, reporting and tax warnings. This is particularly true when an account has been “flagged” after notification by a party or an attorney that certain withdrawals have been suspicious. (“Flagging” an account may not happen automatically upon request; sometimes the entity will require a court order before doing so.) As a result, financial institutions may vary greatly in their requirements as to how the transfer of what they deem to be “securities” must be effectuated. At the same time, both the transferee and the transferor want to effectuate the distribution with as little paperwork and at the lowest cost possible to him or her. The expectant transferee almost invariably seeks to ensure the transfer of the securities to him or her as quickly as possible; usually the transferor could care less about the speed of the transfer unless financial or tax consequences provide motivation for a rapid distribution of the securities at issue.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.