Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

AHLA Seeks Clarification on Physician Malpractice Insurance

By Gerald M. Griffith
June 28, 2004

Last month, we discussed some possible ways that hospitals, in order to maintain staffing needs, can help physicians obtain medical malpractice insurance coverage at reasonable rates. These possible solutions range from giving physicians outright payments to help cover their premiums to establishing a physician insurance program through an independent or hospital-owned insurer. It is important, however, that when hospitals and physicians consider any of these alternatives, they take into account the regulatory implications of any program they may devise.

Common Program Features

For all of these solutions there are certain common questions that arise as to what risk management and quality of care related requirements are appropriate from a regulatory perspective. Requirements that are often considered include:

  • Excluding physicians representing a higher indemnity risk (eg, due to prior claims experience) or a higher quality risk (eg, based on disciplinary or investigative record).
  • Minimum practice levels to demonstrate and maintain competency (eg, active staff of the hospital, minimum average weekly clinical hours, minimum number of procedures in a specialty in the hospital subject to the hospital's risk management program).
  • Minimum CME requirements (including risk management courses approved by the hospital).
  • Limiting coverage in a hospital setting to the “four walls” of the sponsoring hospital and/or restricting the percentage of covered services at other hospitals (so that the sponsoring hospital is not effectively assuming responsibility for losses at other hospitals where it does not control the risk-management function or quality of care practices).
  • Varying the limits of coverage depending on the setting, in direct proportion to the likelihood of joint and several or vicarious liability of the hospital for incidents in that setting.
  • Limiting premium assistance to designated insurance carriers that meet the hospital's requirements regarding financial condition.

These programs, however, typically do not restrict the ability of independent staff physicians to maintain privileges at other facilities. Likewise, these programs typically would not restrict the physician's ability to exercise independent medical judgment to admit or refer patients to another facility or other provider.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.