Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Some Physicians Get Even

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
June 28, 2004

The Orthopedic Specialty Group, a 12-member group of physicians practicing in Connecticut, notified that state's trial lawyers in May that its members would no longer appear at depositions for the fees they'd charged in the past. This move, they said, was made in response to soaring malpractice insurance rates. In the letter, Dr. Robert A. Stanton told the attorney's his groups rates for deposition testimony would jump from the already high rate of $4000 for the first 2 hours and $1000 per hour thereafter to $12,000 per day spent in court. Most doctors in the area charge between $300 and $600 per hour for such services.

Some speculate the group's move is a response to the state legislature's failure in the last legislative session to pass the medical malpractice award caps sought by the medical profession. This theory is bolstered by Stanton's stated reason for the groups' rate increase: a doubling in its medical malpractice premiums as of July 1 of this year, which will add about $500,000 to its insurance bill. The letter noted that the group is willing to look at lowering its rates again if its insurance premiums decline in future and called on attorneys to help in this effort: 'Since you are in a unique position to facilitate change, we would appreciate your support in this matter.'

The letter may not be the last word in deposition fees for the group's members, however. Attorneys still have the option of subpoenaing a physician and asking the court to set a reasonable fee, and Connecticut's judges are unlikely to accept the Orthopedic Specialty Group's fee schedule as reasonable.

The Orthopedic Specialty Group, a 12-member group of physicians practicing in Connecticut, notified that state's trial lawyers in May that its members would no longer appear at depositions for the fees they'd charged in the past. This move, they said, was made in response to soaring malpractice insurance rates. In the letter, Dr. Robert A. Stanton told the attorney's his groups rates for deposition testimony would jump from the already high rate of $4000 for the first 2 hours and $1000 per hour thereafter to $12,000 per day spent in court. Most doctors in the area charge between $300 and $600 per hour for such services.

Some speculate the group's move is a response to the state legislature's failure in the last legislative session to pass the medical malpractice award caps sought by the medical profession. This theory is bolstered by Stanton's stated reason for the groups' rate increase: a doubling in its medical malpractice premiums as of July 1 of this year, which will add about $500,000 to its insurance bill. The letter noted that the group is willing to look at lowering its rates again if its insurance premiums decline in future and called on attorneys to help in this effort: 'Since you are in a unique position to facilitate change, we would appreciate your support in this matter.'

The letter may not be the last word in deposition fees for the group's members, however. Attorneys still have the option of subpoenaing a physician and asking the court to set a reasonable fee, and Connecticut's judges are unlikely to accept the Orthopedic Specialty Group's fee schedule as reasonable.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?