Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Some Physicians Get Even

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
June 28, 2004

The Orthopedic Specialty Group, a 12-member group of physicians practicing in Connecticut, notified that state's trial lawyers in May that its members would no longer appear at depositions for the fees they'd charged in the past. This move, they said, was made in response to soaring malpractice insurance rates. In the letter, Dr. Robert A. Stanton told the attorney's his groups rates for deposition testimony would jump from the already high rate of $4000 for the first 2 hours and $1000 per hour thereafter to $12,000 per day spent in court. Most doctors in the area charge between $300 and $600 per hour for such services.

Some speculate the group's move is a response to the state legislature's failure in the last legislative session to pass the medical malpractice award caps sought by the medical profession. This theory is bolstered by Stanton's stated reason for the groups' rate increase: a doubling in its medical malpractice premiums as of July 1 of this year, which will add about $500,000 to its insurance bill. The letter noted that the group is willing to look at lowering its rates again if its insurance premiums decline in future and called on attorneys to help in this effort: 'Since you are in a unique position to facilitate change, we would appreciate your support in this matter.'

The letter may not be the last word in deposition fees for the group's members, however. Attorneys still have the option of subpoenaing a physician and asking the court to set a reasonable fee, and Connecticut's judges are unlikely to accept the Orthopedic Specialty Group's fee schedule as reasonable.

The Orthopedic Specialty Group, a 12-member group of physicians practicing in Connecticut, notified that state's trial lawyers in May that its members would no longer appear at depositions for the fees they'd charged in the past. This move, they said, was made in response to soaring malpractice insurance rates. In the letter, Dr. Robert A. Stanton told the attorney's his groups rates for deposition testimony would jump from the already high rate of $4000 for the first 2 hours and $1000 per hour thereafter to $12,000 per day spent in court. Most doctors in the area charge between $300 and $600 per hour for such services.

Some speculate the group's move is a response to the state legislature's failure in the last legislative session to pass the medical malpractice award caps sought by the medical profession. This theory is bolstered by Stanton's stated reason for the groups' rate increase: a doubling in its medical malpractice premiums as of July 1 of this year, which will add about $500,000 to its insurance bill. The letter noted that the group is willing to look at lowering its rates again if its insurance premiums decline in future and called on attorneys to help in this effort: 'Since you are in a unique position to facilitate change, we would appreciate your support in this matter.'

The letter may not be the last word in deposition fees for the group's members, however. Attorneys still have the option of subpoenaing a physician and asking the court to set a reasonable fee, and Connecticut's judges are unlikely to accept the Orthopedic Specialty Group's fee schedule as reasonable.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.