Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

All Together Now: ISP Group Releases Spam-Fighting Measures

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
June 29, 2004

Leading Internet service providers (ISPs) say that the industry needs to work together and take proactive steps to stop the conflagration of unwanted e-mails.

The companies ' including leading e-mail providers and ISPs Yahoo!, EarthLink, Microsoft, Comcast and America Online (AOL) ' through the Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA), are calling on other ISPs to adopt a series of actions and policies that they have developed after a year of collaboration to fight spam.

The ASTA proposal, the “Anti-Spam Technical Alliance Technology and Policy Proposal,” focuses two key issues: helping solve the e-mail forgery problem by eliminating domain spoofing through Internet Protocol (IP)-based and signature-based solutions; and best practices to help prevent ISPs and their customers from being sources of spam. According to the proposal: “Implementing the recommendations in this document can help reduce many of the worst types of spam, forgery, and spoofing that occur in e-mail. These technologies will not stop spam entirely, but implementing these recommendations will significantly enhance the Internet community's ability to trace the source of spam and hold senders accountable for their actions. This ability will provide the foundation for building future solutions.”

The recommendation that's getting the most attention is the call for those infected with computer viruses that result in their unknowingly sending tons of spam e-mails to be taken offline until their machines can be cleaned up. Other recommendations include:

  • Developing complaint reporting systems;
  • Closing all open relays;
  • Implementing rate limits on outbound e-mail traffic; and
  • Implementing authenticated e-mail submission.

“We believe that thanks to continued innovation and the ongoing cooperation of governments and industry around the world, we are on the right path to turn the tide against spammers ' but further change is needed on an industry-wide basis to thoroughly contain the problem for consumers and businesses worldwide,” said Ryan Hamlin, general manager of the Anti-Spam Technology & Strategy Team at Microsoft in a statement. “Our aim with this proposal is to help lay out a clear framework for the industry as we continue to work together to end the spam business and put our customers back in control of their inboxes once again.”

“By collaborating on new ways to better identify the origin of messages, we can help lift the veil of anonymity on spammers and restore the integrity of e-mail, Linda Beck, executive vice president of Operations at EarthLink said in her statement. “We encourage continued testing and public discussion in order to move toward industry-standard technical solutions.”

Some estimates place the cost of spam to ISPs at roughly $500 million each year in wasted bandwidth, legal bills and additional customer-service costs; and that spam now accounts for up to 83% of all e-mail traffic.

Each of the ASTA companies has the full proposal available on their Web sites. Yahoo!'s can be found at http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/pdf/asta_soi.pdf.

' Steve Salkin

Leading Internet service providers (ISPs) say that the industry needs to work together and take proactive steps to stop the conflagration of unwanted e-mails.

The companies ' including leading e-mail providers and ISPs Yahoo!, EarthLink, Microsoft, Comcast and America Online (AOL) ' through the Anti-Spam Technical Alliance (ASTA), are calling on other ISPs to adopt a series of actions and policies that they have developed after a year of collaboration to fight spam.

The ASTA proposal, the “Anti-Spam Technical Alliance Technology and Policy Proposal,” focuses two key issues: helping solve the e-mail forgery problem by eliminating domain spoofing through Internet Protocol (IP)-based and signature-based solutions; and best practices to help prevent ISPs and their customers from being sources of spam. According to the proposal: “Implementing the recommendations in this document can help reduce many of the worst types of spam, forgery, and spoofing that occur in e-mail. These technologies will not stop spam entirely, but implementing these recommendations will significantly enhance the Internet community's ability to trace the source of spam and hold senders accountable for their actions. This ability will provide the foundation for building future solutions.”

The recommendation that's getting the most attention is the call for those infected with computer viruses that result in their unknowingly sending tons of spam e-mails to be taken offline until their machines can be cleaned up. Other recommendations include:

  • Developing complaint reporting systems;
  • Closing all open relays;
  • Implementing rate limits on outbound e-mail traffic; and
  • Implementing authenticated e-mail submission.

“We believe that thanks to continued innovation and the ongoing cooperation of governments and industry around the world, we are on the right path to turn the tide against spammers ' but further change is needed on an industry-wide basis to thoroughly contain the problem for consumers and businesses worldwide,” said Ryan Hamlin, general manager of the Anti-Spam Technology & Strategy Team at Microsoft in a statement. “Our aim with this proposal is to help lay out a clear framework for the industry as we continue to work together to end the spam business and put our customers back in control of their inboxes once again.”

“By collaborating on new ways to better identify the origin of messages, we can help lift the veil of anonymity on spammers and restore the integrity of e-mail, Linda Beck, executive vice president of Operations at EarthLink said in her statement. “We encourage continued testing and public discussion in order to move toward industry-standard technical solutions.”

Some estimates place the cost of spam to ISPs at roughly $500 million each year in wasted bandwidth, legal bills and additional customer-service costs; and that spam now accounts for up to 83% of all e-mail traffic.

Each of the ASTA companies has the full proposal available on their Web sites. Yahoo!'s can be found at http://docs.yahoo.com/docs/pr/pdf/asta_soi.pdf.

' Steve Salkin

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?