Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CALIFORNIA
Air Pollution Credit Broker Arrested for Fraud
Anne Masters Sholtz, the owner of a California company called Sholtz & Associates that brokered air pollution credits, was arrested on seven counts of wire fraud in connection with alleged misrepresentations made to a purchaser of air pollution credits. The air pollution credit trading program is regulated as part of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. According to the criminal complaint filed against the defendant, Sholtz allegedly induced a company called AG Clean Air, a New York-based company that trades in pollution credits, to purchase $12.5 million of the tradable credits by representing that a Mobil refinery in Southern California was willing to purchase the credits for $17.5 million. Sholtz allegedly sent AG Clean Air a payment well short of the $17.5 million purchase price, and then allegedly fabricated faxes and e-mails purporting to show that Mobil was still in negotiations to purchase the credits, and arranged for associates to pretend to be Mobil employees. If convicted on all charges, the defendant faces a sentence of up to 35 years in prison.
California Company Sentenced for Violation of Export Administration Regulations
Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation (BNC) has pleaded guilty to willfully violating a license under the International Emergency Economic Powers and has been sentenced to 5 years' probation and ordered to pay a $300,000 criminal fine for shipping a pulse generator to India. The U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) regulate the export of certain technology to certain countries in the interest of national security, nonproliferation, and other goals. The EAR prohibits the export of pulse generators, which are used to calibrate radar and nuclear instruments, without authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce. According to the plea agreement filed with the Court, BNC shipped a pulse generator to the Bhaba Atomic Research Center in India, knowing that shipments of such devices are controlled by the EAR, without applying for or obtaining an export license. The prosecution was the result of an investigation by the United States Department of Commerce.
CALIFORNIA
Air Pollution Credit Broker Arrested for Fraud
Anne Masters Sholtz, the owner of a California company called Sholtz & Associates that brokered air pollution credits, was arrested on seven counts of wire fraud in connection with alleged misrepresentations made to a purchaser of air pollution credits. The air pollution credit trading program is regulated as part of the South Coast Air Quality Management District. According to the criminal complaint filed against the defendant, Sholtz allegedly induced a company called AG Clean Air, a New York-based company that trades in pollution credits, to purchase $12.5 million of the tradable credits by representing that a Mobil refinery in Southern California was willing to purchase the credits for $17.5 million. Sholtz allegedly sent AG Clean Air a payment well short of the $17.5 million purchase price, and then allegedly fabricated faxes and e-mails purporting to show that Mobil was still in negotiations to purchase the credits, and arranged for associates to pretend to be Mobil employees. If convicted on all charges, the defendant faces a sentence of up to 35 years in prison.
California Company Sentenced for Violation of Export Administration Regulations
Berkeley Nucleonics Corporation (BNC) has pleaded guilty to willfully violating a license under the International Emergency Economic Powers and has been sentenced to 5 years' probation and ordered to pay a $300,000 criminal fine for shipping a pulse generator to India. The U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) regulate the export of certain technology to certain countries in the interest of national security, nonproliferation, and other goals. The EAR prohibits the export of pulse generators, which are used to calibrate radar and nuclear instruments, without authorization from the U.S. Department of Commerce. According to the plea agreement filed with the Court, BNC shipped a pulse generator to the Bhaba Atomic Research Center in India, knowing that shipments of such devices are controlled by the EAR, without applying for or obtaining an export license. The prosecution was the result of an investigation by the United States Department of Commerce.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?