Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Treasury Department announced on June 18 that it will extend the “make available” provisions of the Terrorism Risk Insurance Act (TRIA) through 2005, the third year of the federal Terrorism Risk Insurance Program.
The “make available” provisions require that, from the date of enactment (Nov. 26, 2002) through the last day of the second year of the program (Dec. 31, 2004), each insurer must make available, in all of its commercial property and casualty insurance policies, coverage for losses due to covered acts of terrorism that does not differ materially from the terms, amounts and other coverage limitations applicable to losses arising from events other than acts of terrorism. This decision is triggered by the TRIA, which requires that the Secretary of the Treasury determine whether the “make available” provisions should be extended through the third and final year of the program by Sept. 1, 2004. Additionally, the TRIA mandates that the Treasury complete a study of the effectiveness and success of the overall Act by June 2005. This comprehensive study is independent from the “make available” determination.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.