Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Uniformity and predictability are often lacking from judicial treatment of cases involving vicarious liability claims against franchisors, yet uniformity and predictability are the hallmarks of a successful franchise system, and the engines that have driven franchising to occupy such a prominent position in the domestic and worldwide economy.
Franchise agreement contract terms frequently reflect very legitimate operational and legal concerns of franchisors. With franchisees all over the country and beyond, a forum selection clause and a home-state choice of law clause make eminent good sense, at least to franchisors ' notwithstanding the denomination of out-of-state forum selection and choice-of-law clauses as “risk factors” to some states regulating franchise sales. A franchisor should, the argument goes, have the benefit of uniformity and predictability that comes from having its home state laws applied by its home state courts or arbitrators to all legal issues arising under its agreements with its far-flung franchisees.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.