Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Sabbaticals Benefit Both Firms and Partners

By Robert W. Denney
July 27, 2004

A steadily increasing number of law firms are offering partners the opportunity to take a sabbatical. A few firms are even requiring them to do so. And more lawyers are taking them. It's a “win-win” situation.

The firms benefit in several ways. There is substantial evidence that offering sabbaticals enhances recruiting and improves retention. It can also help the firm weather downturns by trimming excess lawyer capacity while, at the same time, retaining valuable practitioners until business picks up again.

'A Change Will Do You Good'

The partners benefit as well. A period of time away from practice refreshes them and “recharges their batteries,” resulting in renewed energy and productivity when they return. Other benefits include providing extended time to be with their families and/or the opportunity for personal self-improvement by taking up a new hobby, writing a book or taking that long-postponed trip to a far-off country. In other words, sabbaticals can improve a partner's quality of life.

As would be expected, different firms have different approaches. At Arnold & Porter in Washington, DC, partners are entitled to two sabbaticals beginning in their seventh year of partnership. Each sabbatical can be up to 6 months long with no requirements on what the partner does during the sabbatical. While on leave, partners receive half their regular compensation.

Sabbaticals at Ball Janik in Portland, OR, are mandatory and have been ever since the firm was founded over 20 years ago. Lawyers must take 4 months off every 5 years after becoming a partner. During the sabbatical, they receive full draws, distributions and benefits although they are expected to forego their vacation time.

Partners at Denver's Holland & Hart are eligible for the sabbatical program after 5 years with the firm, including two as a partner. Sabbaticals are usually 3-months long and cannot be taken more than once every 5 years. Partners receive full pay while on leave but are prohibited from taking a paid position during that time.

Partners who have been with Hogan & Hartson in Washington, DC for 10 years, including five as a partner, are entitled to a 3-month sabbatical. If they have been with the firm since Jan. 1, 1995, they are entitled to 6 months. There must be 7 years between sabbaticals and no more than 5% of the partners can take leave during the same year. While on sabbatical, partners receive full compensation and are permitted to do anything except practice law.

Lessons Learned

Firms that offer sabbatical programs have learned some important things. The first is that, in most cases, with proper advance notice and planning, clients are tolerant and even supportive. In some instances, introducing other lawyers helps turn clients into firm clients, forces the lawyers to work as a team and makes firm business less portable.

Although smaller firms that offer sabbaticals may suffer some lost revenue, the impact on the overall firm is minimal. In large firms, there appears to be no lost revenue. While there is a possibility that partners who take sabbaticals are more likely to leave the firm afterward, this apparently does not happen often. When it does, the firms feel they would probably have lost the partners anyway ' for one reason or another.

Firms that offer sabbaticals have developed policies to deal with the issues. The length of most sabbaticals is between 3 and 6 months (although Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft in New York allows post-fifth year associates to take 1-month's leave.) Firms employ various alternatives regarding compensation. In some, partners receive full compensation while in others they receive partial pay. Regardless of various firms' policies on compensation, all generally continue to provide full benefits during the sabbatical.



Robert Denney [email protected]

A steadily increasing number of law firms are offering partners the opportunity to take a sabbatical. A few firms are even requiring them to do so. And more lawyers are taking them. It's a “win-win” situation.

The firms benefit in several ways. There is substantial evidence that offering sabbaticals enhances recruiting and improves retention. It can also help the firm weather downturns by trimming excess lawyer capacity while, at the same time, retaining valuable practitioners until business picks up again.

'A Change Will Do You Good'

The partners benefit as well. A period of time away from practice refreshes them and “recharges their batteries,” resulting in renewed energy and productivity when they return. Other benefits include providing extended time to be with their families and/or the opportunity for personal self-improvement by taking up a new hobby, writing a book or taking that long-postponed trip to a far-off country. In other words, sabbaticals can improve a partner's quality of life.

As would be expected, different firms have different approaches. At Arnold & Porter in Washington, DC, partners are entitled to two sabbaticals beginning in their seventh year of partnership. Each sabbatical can be up to 6 months long with no requirements on what the partner does during the sabbatical. While on leave, partners receive half their regular compensation.

Sabbaticals at Ball Janik in Portland, OR, are mandatory and have been ever since the firm was founded over 20 years ago. Lawyers must take 4 months off every 5 years after becoming a partner. During the sabbatical, they receive full draws, distributions and benefits although they are expected to forego their vacation time.

Partners at Denver's Holland & Hart are eligible for the sabbatical program after 5 years with the firm, including two as a partner. Sabbaticals are usually 3-months long and cannot be taken more than once every 5 years. Partners receive full pay while on leave but are prohibited from taking a paid position during that time.

Partners who have been with Hogan & Hartson in Washington, DC for 10 years, including five as a partner, are entitled to a 3-month sabbatical. If they have been with the firm since Jan. 1, 1995, they are entitled to 6 months. There must be 7 years between sabbaticals and no more than 5% of the partners can take leave during the same year. While on sabbatical, partners receive full compensation and are permitted to do anything except practice law.

Lessons Learned

Firms that offer sabbatical programs have learned some important things. The first is that, in most cases, with proper advance notice and planning, clients are tolerant and even supportive. In some instances, introducing other lawyers helps turn clients into firm clients, forces the lawyers to work as a team and makes firm business less portable.

Although smaller firms that offer sabbaticals may suffer some lost revenue, the impact on the overall firm is minimal. In large firms, there appears to be no lost revenue. While there is a possibility that partners who take sabbaticals are more likely to leave the firm afterward, this apparently does not happen often. When it does, the firms feel they would probably have lost the partners anyway ' for one reason or another.

Firms that offer sabbaticals have developed policies to deal with the issues. The length of most sabbaticals is between 3 and 6 months (although Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft in New York allows post-fifth year associates to take 1-month's leave.) Firms employ various alternatives regarding compensation. In some, partners receive full compensation while in others they receive partial pay. Regardless of various firms' policies on compensation, all generally continue to provide full benefits during the sabbatical.



Robert Denney [email protected]

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Overview of Regulatory Guidance Governing the Use of AI Systems In the Workplace Image

Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.

Is Google Search Dead? How AI Is Reshaping Search and SEO Image

This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.

While Federal Legislation Flounders, State Privacy Laws for Children and Teens Gain Momentum Image

For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.

Revolutionizing Workplace Design: A Perspective from Gray Reed Image

In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.

From DeepSeek to Distillation: Protecting IP In An AI World Image

Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.