Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There's a newly urgent push from outside the pharmaceutical research and development community to get drug firms to disclose the results of all tests conducted on new drugs, even those that don't lead to the marketing of new medications.
The latest impetus for the movement apparently came from public outrage over undisclosed unfavorable results in tests of Paxil', the antidepressant manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. The pharmaceutical manufacturer had published test results that showed Paxil's advantages in treating depression, but did not disclose certain problems that could develop when taking the drug. Some of those unfavorable test results came to light when a researcher who had worked on the development of Paxil disclosed them at a conference. Members of the public began to ask the question: “What else are the drug companies keeping from us?” When British regulators last year asked for and received unpublished test findings for several antidepressants, they got the full story. The British conclusion: Drug manufacturers had evidence that antidepressants could engender suicidal ideation in children and adolescents, but they had failed to clue the public in to these findings. Disclosure of this information, of course, caused a good deal of consternation in the medical world, with parents and medical practitioners questioning the wisdom of giving youngsters such medications at all.
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.