Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
There's a newly urgent push from outside the pharmaceutical research and development community to get drug firms to disclose the results of all tests conducted on new drugs, even those that don't lead to the marketing of new medications.
The latest impetus for the movement apparently came from public outrage over undisclosed unfavorable results in tests of Paxil', the antidepressant manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline. The pharmaceutical manufacturer had published test results that showed Paxil's advantages in treating depression, but did not disclose certain problems that could develop when taking the drug. Some of those unfavorable test results came to light when a researcher who had worked on the development of Paxil disclosed them at a conference. Members of the public began to ask the question: “What else are the drug companies keeping from us?” When British regulators last year asked for and received unpublished test findings for several antidepressants, they got the full story. The British conclusion: Drug manufacturers had evidence that antidepressants could engender suicidal ideation in children and adolescents, but they had failed to clue the public in to these findings. Disclosure of this information, of course, caused a good deal of consternation in the medical world, with parents and medical practitioners questioning the wisdom of giving youngsters such medications at all.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.