Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Index
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Condominium Sponsor Entitled to Retain 25% Deposit
Uzan v. 845 UN Limited Partnership
* * *
Development
Shopping Center: Historical Resource Review
Business and Residents Alliance of East Harlem v. Martinez
Zoning Board Must Consider Corporation Counsel's Power to Bind
Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Habitability Claim
Witherbee Court Associates v. Greene
Mailed Notice To Cure Requires 5 Additional Days
Matter of ATM One, LLC v. Landaverde
Illegal Loft Tenants Not Protected by ETPA
Wolinsky v. Kee Yip Realty Corp
City as Tenant Liable for Structural Repairs
Sonny Boy Realty, Inc. v. City of New York
Common Ownership/ Horizontal Multiple Dwelling
In re 721 Ninth Avenue, LLC v. DHCR
Tenant Entitled to Yellowstone Injunction
TSI West 14th, Inc. v. Samson Associates
* * *
Real Property Law
County Clerk May Not Accept MERS Discharges for Recording
Merscorp. Inc. v. Romaine
Agreement to Restrict Foreclosure Bidding Held Enforceable
Republic National Bank v. Ortiz
Encroachments Do Not Make Title Unmarketable
Axys, LLC v. Ng
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Condominium Sponsor Entitled to Retain 25% Deposit
Uzan v. 845 UN Limited Partnership
* * *
Development
Shopping Center: Historical Resource Review
Business and Residents Alliance of East Harlem v. Martinez
Zoning Board Must Consider Corporation Counsel's Power to Bind
Haberman v. Zoning Board of Appeals
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Habitability Claim
Witherbee Court Associates v. Greene
Mailed Notice To Cure Requires 5 Additional Days
Matter of ATM One, LLC v. Landaverde
Illegal Loft Tenants Not Protected by ETPA
Wolinsky v. Kee Yip Realty Corp
City as Tenant Liable for Structural Repairs
Sonny Boy Realty, Inc. v. City of
Common Ownership/ Horizontal Multiple Dwelling
In re 721 Ninth Avenue, LLC v. DHCR
Tenant Entitled to Yellowstone Injunction
TSI West 14th, Inc. v. Samson Associates
* * *
Real Property Law
County Clerk May Not Accept MERS Discharges for Recording
Merscorp. Inc. v. Romaine
Agreement to Restrict Foreclosure Bidding Held Enforceable
Republic National Bank v. Ortiz
Encroachments Do Not Make Title Unmarketable
Axys, LLC v. Ng
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.