From Cradle to Grave

The clients' focus at the outset of a transaction is on making sure that the deal gets done and that their business points are addressed. Unfortunately, as a result, when disaster subsequently hits, their bankruptcy lawyers may be faced with litigating and enforcing contracts that may fail to address or define defaults, remedies, ownership, security interests, attorneys' fees and bankruptcy, except for unenforceable ipso facto clauses. At that point, there may be little a bankruptcy lawyer can do to protect a client that is relying on a contract that leaves out key terms; is riddled with ambiguities that can be construed in the opponent's favor; or fails to incorporate any strategies for protecting the client from the risk of default, litigation and bankruptcy.

Unfortunately, bankruptcy lawyers are rarely, if ever, given the opportunity to get involved in structuring or drafting a new transaction because clients shortsightedly may relegate or typecast them as the “undertakers” of the legal profession, rather than those who should be called upon to review deals that are in their infancy. However, bankruptcy lawyers may be the best able to protect their clients from the outset because it is in bankruptcy courts and other litigation arenas that these transactions are tested, and found to be lacking. As a result, after years of fighting over the interpretation and enforcement of transactions drafted by others, bankruptcy lawyers have developed a key expertise in analyzing how those transactions should be supplemented or enhanced from the outset to protect their clients from subsequent disasters.