Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Rescission Action
Alper v. Seavey
* * *
Development
Area Variance Denied
Matter of Chandler Property v. Trotta
Not-for-Profit Entitled to Use Variance Matter of Homes
Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards and Appeals
Zoning Fine Limited by Accusatory Instrument
People v. Melchner
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Agreement to Vacate Stabilized Apartment
Bravo Realty Corp. v. Lewis
Cardkey System
Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenants' Assoc. v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.
Lease Requires Increase to be Based on Preferential Rent
448 West 54th Street Corp. v. Doig-Marx
Beth Din Determination
New Eagle, Inc. v. H.R. Neumann Associates, Inc.
Tenant Excused from Failure to Timely Exercise Option to Renew
Rachel Bridge Corp. V. Dishi
* * *
Real Property Law
Mortgagor's Fraudulent Conveyance
Citibank, N.A. v. Plagakis
Owner of Landlocked Parcel Obtained Easement By Necessity
Bogart v. Roven
Right of First Refusal
Hermann v. AMD Realty, Inc
Ambiguity in Use of Word 'Abut'
Helena Realty, Inc. v. Impala Associates, L.P.
Notice of Cure Rider
Belle Harbor Washington Hotel, Inc. v. Jefferson Omega Corp.
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Rescission Action
Alper v. Seavey
* * *
Development
Area Variance Denied
Matter of Chandler Property v. Trotta
Not-for-Profit Entitled to Use Variance Matter of Homes
Homeless, Inc. v. Board of Standards and Appeals
Zoning Fine Limited by Accusatory Instrument
People v. Melchner
* * *
Landlord & Tenant
Agreement to Vacate Stabilized Apartment
Bravo Realty Corp. v.
Cardkey System
Stuyvesant Town-Peter Cooper Village Tenants' Assoc. v.
Lease Requires Increase to be Based on Preferential Rent
448 West 54th Street Corp. v. Doig-Marx
Beth Din Determination
New Eagle, Inc. v. H.R. Neumann Associates, Inc.
Tenant Excused from Failure to Timely Exercise Option to Renew
Rachel Bridge Corp. V. Dishi
* * *
Real Property Law
Mortgagor's Fraudulent Conveyance
Owner of Landlocked Parcel Obtained Easement By Necessity
Bogart v. Roven
Right of First Refusal
Hermann v. AMD Realty, Inc
Ambiguity in Use of Word 'Abut'
Helena Realty, Inc. v. Impala Associates, L.P.
Notice of Cure Rider
Belle Harbor Washington Hotel, Inc. v. Jefferson Omega Corp.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
As organizations enhance their e-discovery processes and infrastructure, the expectation to leverage technology to maximize service delivery increases. However, legal professionals must balance innovation with humanity.
The business-law issue of whether and when a corporate defendant is considered distinct from its affiliated entities emerged on December 11 at the U.S. Supreme Court, with the justices confronting whether a non-defendant’s affiliate’s revenue can be part of a judge’s calculation of the monetary remedy for the corporate defendant’s infringement of a trademark.
The most forward-thinking companies embrace AI with complete confidence because they have created governance programs that serve as guardrails for this incredible new technology. Effective governance ensures AI consistently aligns with an organization’s best interests, safeguarding against potential risks while unlocking its full potential.
It’s time for our annual poll of experts on what they expect 2025 to bring in legal tech, including generative AI (of course), e-discovery, and more.
AI’s rapid market proliferation and regulatory expansion mirrors privacy’s, and businesses should model their contractual AI compliance on the successes of privacy law’s DPA and BAA.