Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Copyright/Work-for-Hire
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that choreography created by dance legend Martha Graham ' while she was artistic director of a school that bore her name and that was “created to serve the creative endeavors of an artistic genius” ' belonged to the school. Martha Graham School and Dance Foundation Inc. v. Martha Graham Center of Contemporary Dance Inc., 02-9451(L). In reaching its conclusion, the appeals court noted, among other things, “In arguing that Graham's dances were not created at the 'instance' of the Center, the [plaintiffs] endeavor to give that word a more particularized meaning than is appropriate for the context in which the 'instance and expense' [work-for-hire] test applies. There is no need for the employer to be the precipitating force behind each work created by a salaried employee, acting within the scope of her regular employment.”
Film Disputes/Proper Venue
The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a motion to transfer a lawsuit brought over the defendants' film “Drumline” to the Central District of California. Lassiter v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp., 03 Civ. 8174 (RO). The plaintiffs allege copyright infringement and Lanham Act violations arising from their film “Pay the Price,” which like Fox's “Drumline,” is about African-American college bands. The Manhattan district court first noted that Fox's principal place of business is in Los Angeles. Then in granting the transfer request, the court stated, “Fox argues that this case belongs in California because a substantial number of witnesses and records are located there. Others are scattered around the country. Few are to be found in New York, and fewer still in the Southern District of New York.”
Internet Downloading/ Copyright Damages
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?