Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Band Names/Trademarks
The owner of the trademark for the rock band Survivor failed to show dilution or likelihood of confusion regarding the defendants' distribution of music CDs and merchandise with the logo of the TV series “Survivor,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit decided. Sullivan v. CBS Corp., 02-2058. The district court had granted summary judgment for the defendants. The appeals court first ruled that the plaintiff's mark was arbitrary, rather than descriptive. A descriptive mark indicates the ingredient or characteristic of a mark, thus the appeals court noted that term “Survivor” wasn't descriptive of a musical band. But that the mark was arbitrary and generally entitled to greater protection didn't help the plaintiff in this case. The fundamental issue remained whether the public associated the mark with the source of a particular product and on this the court stated that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient evidence. According to the court, “Survivor has not released a new album in the United States since 1993. Sullivan offered nothing about how much money he spends promoting the Band, or on advertising for the Band, nor did he provide any evidence of how much money the Band has earned. … There is simply no evidence that 'Survivor' the Band enjoys fame and recognition as the originator of any products other than rock albums and concert t-shirts.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
There's current litigation in the ongoing Beach Boys litigation saga. A lawsuit filed in 2019 against Nevada residents Mike Love and his wife Jacquelyne in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nevada that alleges inaccurate payment by the Loves under the retainer agreement and seeks $84.5 million in damages.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The real property transfer tax does not apply to all leases, and understanding the tax rules of the applicable jurisdiction can allow parties to plan ahead to avoid unnecessary tax liability.