Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
CASE CAPTION: Bills Dirks (aka Frankie Ross) v. Taxi Productions Inc., KJLH Radio, Steveland Morris Productions and Steveland Morris, L.A. Superior Court # BC321897.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Wrongful termination in violation of public policy; unfair business practices in violation of Calif. Business and Professions Code Sec. 17200 et seq.; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: The plaintiff was a disc jockey for KJLH, a station in Inglewood, CA. In June 2003, the plaintiff was contacted by a representative of a record company who said he had been instructed by Aundrae Russell, the station's program director, to contact the station's creative director, Levi Booker, if he wanted a certain Earth, Wind & Fire song added to the station's playlist. Booker told the representative that this would cost $3500. The representative gave the amount to him in cash. The representative told the plaintiff that KJLH was not giving the song enough play. When the plaintiff told Russell about this, Russell appeared angry that the plaintiff had this information. From then on, Russell's attitude toward the plaintiff became hostile. About 2-3 weeks later, the station conducted a promotional event spotlighting Earth, Wind & Fire for a full day. To the plaintiff's knowledge, the station had never done this for anyone except defendant Morris (aka Stevie Wonder), who has a substantial ownership interest in the station. When the plaintiff later told Wonder of his concerns, Wonder said that he would put Booker on notice to straighten up or be fired. In October 2003, Russell fired the plaintiff without offering a reason.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?