Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Constant connectivity creates pressure to work around-the-clock, wherever you may be. After all, the Net is always on ' and open for business.
But tapping away at a laptop during a ballgame? It's coming: Many pro and college sports teams have built stadiums with wireless access (See www.informationweek.com/story/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=22103332&tid=13690). They anticipate fans accessing statistics, trivia and, perhaps, one day, even replays or electronic concession stands. (See www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2004/07/13/peanuts_popcorn_wifi.)
At least one team found a different problem. The chief information officer of baseball's San Francisco Giants, speaking about his Wi-Fi enabled stadium, complained: “The real problem is business people coming and doing their office e-mails at the game.”
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?