Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal Circuit Evaluates the Use of Domain Names in Trademarks
The Federal Circuit affirmed that absent secondary meaning, the mark “patents.com” for patent tracking software was descriptive, but that no bright line rule exists that would automatically preclude the distinctiveness of a domain name added to a descriptive term.
In In re Oppedahl, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 12875 (Fed. Cir. 2004), the USPTO refused to register “patents.com” because the term “patents” was deemed descriptive for patent tracking software and the addition of “.com” did not make the mark distinctive. In rejecting the mark, the USPTO pointed to the policy regarding top level domain names (“TLDs”) in the Trademark Manual of Examination and Procedure (“TMEP”), which states “because TLDs serve generally no source-indicating function, their addition to an unregisterable mark typically cannot render it registerable.” On appeal, Applicants argued that the USPTO had developed a bright line rule against the distinctiveness of TLDs and was not properly considering the mark in its entirety.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?