Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Newcomer's Trademark Rights Take Back Seat in Limited Area to Local Prior User

By Judith L. Grubner
October 08, 2004

What happens when a large newcomer to a geographic region with a federal registration for its service mark encounters a smaller pre-existing business in that region with prior use of a similar mark for the same services? Enjoinable reverse infringement results, according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Evans City, Case Nos. 03-2868 and 03-3175 (3d Cir. 2004).

When Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG), a subsidiary holding company of the Royal Bank of Scotland, bought the retail banking operations of Mellon Bank in July 2001, it converted all of the Mellon branches in Pennsylvania to “Citizens Bank” branches. However, a number of those branches were located near (some on the same streets as) branches of Citizens National Bank of Evans City (CNBEC), founded in 1878 and doing business through 16 branches in northwestern Pennsylvania. Federally chartered in 1907, CNBEC has branches in Butler, north Allegheny and Armstrong counties. It refers to itself as “Citizens” in advertising and promotional materials and in customer communications. In addition to the former Mellon branches in Pennsylvania, CFG has hundreds of branches throughout the east coast of the United States. It advertises itself as “one of the largest banks in the world.” It also has a federal registration for the service mark CITIZENS BANK, issued Aug. 28, 2001. CNBEC has not registered the service marks CITIZENS or CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.

CNBEC promptly sent CFG a cease and desist letter requesting that CFG not use “Citizens” as the name for its western Pennsylvania branches. CFG responded by filing suit for a declaratory judgment that it could not be prevented from using “Citizens.” CNBEC counterclaimed for trademark infringement and unfair competition. The U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania denied CNBEC's motion for a preliminary injunction and a jury trial was held. CNBEC claimed that CFG's “Citizens Bank” mark infringed both “Citizens” and “Citizens National Bank” and that CFG committed unfair competition and was unjustly enriched. The evidence included testimony about actual confusion by customers, including mistaken attempts at check cashing, loan payments, money deposits, ATM use and others.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Benefits of Blockchain for e-Discovery and Data Preservation Image

As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.