Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
What happens when a large newcomer to a geographic region with a federal registration for its service mark encounters a smaller pre-existing business in that region with prior use of a similar mark for the same services? Enjoinable reverse infringement results, according to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. Citizens Financial Group, Inc. v. Citizens National Bank of Evans City, Case Nos. 03-2868 and 03-3175 (3d Cir. 2004).
When Citizens Financial Group, Inc. (CFG), a subsidiary holding company of the Royal Bank of Scotland, bought the retail banking operations of Mellon Bank in July 2001, it converted all of the Mellon branches in Pennsylvania to “Citizens Bank” branches. However, a number of those branches were located near (some on the same streets as) branches of Citizens National Bank of Evans City (CNBEC), founded in 1878 and doing business through 16 branches in northwestern Pennsylvania. Federally chartered in 1907, CNBEC has branches in Butler, north Allegheny and Armstrong counties. It refers to itself as “Citizens” in advertising and promotional materials and in customer communications. In addition to the former Mellon branches in Pennsylvania, CFG has hundreds of branches throughout the east coast of the United States. It advertises itself as “one of the largest banks in the world.” It also has a federal registration for the service mark CITIZENS BANK, issued Aug. 28, 2001. CNBEC has not registered the service marks CITIZENS or CITIZENS NATIONAL BANK.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.