Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Courthouse Steps
CASE CAPTION: Loretta Jody Miller v. Tom Sizemore; Universal Studios; Universal Network T.V.; Bare Knuckles Production; CBS Entertainment; CBS Drama Development; and Forward Pass Production, L.A. Superior Court # BC323417.
CAUSES OF ACTION: Harassment, discrimination and retaliation in violation of the California Fair Employment and Housing Act; retaliation in violation of public policy; wrongful termination in violation of public policy; negligence and negligent supervision; and intentional infliction of emotional distress.
COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: Defendant Sizemore stars in the TV series “Robbery Homicide Division.” He has engaged in egregious acts of sexual harassment against the plaintiff and other females. This has included engaging in sexual conduct with prostitutes in his trailer while forcing the plaintiff to do her job in the same area, making offensive statements in her presence, grabbing his genital area, masturbating in the plaintiff's presence, grabbing the plaintiff's buttocks and dropping his pants and pushing his penis into the plaintiff's face. The other defendants refused to stop Sizemore and told the plaintiff to ignore him. In retaliation for the plaintiff's opposition to his conduct, Sizemore told her that she was fired from her job. (The suit doesn't say what the job was.)
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?