Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

New Hardware Could Affect Online Subscription Pricing

By Christian Castle
November 01, 2004

Microsoft has recently introduced a new application, currently called “Janus,” that allows tethered downloads to be exported to Janus-enabled portable devices. There are two devices available that use Janus and retail in the $500 range.

If Janus players become prevalent (although it is hard to see how they will ever overtake the iPod's market dominance), online services that offer both on-demand streaming, tethered downloads and permanent downloads may find a drop-off ' perhaps sharply ' in the sale of permanent downloads, because users will not have an economic incentive to buy permanent downloads when they have access to unlimited tethered downloads that can be transferred to portable devices enabled with Janus.

Some thought is being given to how pricing should be addressed for tethered downloads. First, it may be premature to do much of anything to address the issue as the iPod is clearly the dominant digital music device. The iPod plays only the proprietary Apple Fairplay/AAC code, and is not likely to be transcoded at any time in the foreseeable future to permit interoperability with a Windows operating system or software. Given the clear preference of consumers for the iPod, it may not make sense to introduce a price change in the market until there has been some time to observe how much uptake there is among consumers for Janus-enabled digital music devices.

Some thought is being given to increasing prices for subscription services across the board, rather than distinguishing a price point for Janus and non-Janus devices. This would probably be a mistake. There has been pressure from the major labels to raise wholesale and retail prices, and some proposals have been as high as a 25% wholesale price increase, even without Janus being taken into account. But however much copyright owners may hunger for a price increase, it is still far too early in the life cycle of the online services to risk creating an economic incentive for users to risk using the illegal file-bartering networks by introducing a price shock into the economic system online.

Nevertheless, over time one should expect to see upward pressure on subscription prices for users with Janus-enabled players, at least with respect to tethered downloads. It seems unlikely that including unlimited tethered downloads in an “all-you-can-eat” subscription price can continue if Janus devices result in a significant drop-off in the sale of permanent downloads. It may be time to revisit the entire concept of tethered downloads, and Janus may present an opportunity (and justification) to alter the practice in a way that drives consumers more directly toward download purchases. If one believes that consumers do not wish to “rent” or “rent to buy” their music, it seems that it is only a matter of time until subscription models become a thing of the past. The wildly successful iTunes Music Store ' a permanent download-only model ' would certainly be one clear indication of this trend.

The more sensible approach, then, would probably be the introduction of a tiered-pricing model to mark up subscription pricing for users of Janus devices by some premium, and keeping permanent download pricing relatively constant. Early indications are that the premium may be in the 50%-100% range.

Microsoft has recently introduced a new application, currently called “Janus,” that allows tethered downloads to be exported to Janus-enabled portable devices. There are two devices available that use Janus and retail in the $500 range.

If Janus players become prevalent (although it is hard to see how they will ever overtake the iPod's market dominance), online services that offer both on-demand streaming, tethered downloads and permanent downloads may find a drop-off ' perhaps sharply ' in the sale of permanent downloads, because users will not have an economic incentive to buy permanent downloads when they have access to unlimited tethered downloads that can be transferred to portable devices enabled with Janus.

Some thought is being given to how pricing should be addressed for tethered downloads. First, it may be premature to do much of anything to address the issue as the iPod is clearly the dominant digital music device. The iPod plays only the proprietary Apple Fairplay/AAC code, and is not likely to be transcoded at any time in the foreseeable future to permit interoperability with a Windows operating system or software. Given the clear preference of consumers for the iPod, it may not make sense to introduce a price change in the market until there has been some time to observe how much uptake there is among consumers for Janus-enabled digital music devices.

Some thought is being given to increasing prices for subscription services across the board, rather than distinguishing a price point for Janus and non-Janus devices. This would probably be a mistake. There has been pressure from the major labels to raise wholesale and retail prices, and some proposals have been as high as a 25% wholesale price increase, even without Janus being taken into account. But however much copyright owners may hunger for a price increase, it is still far too early in the life cycle of the online services to risk creating an economic incentive for users to risk using the illegal file-bartering networks by introducing a price shock into the economic system online.

Nevertheless, over time one should expect to see upward pressure on subscription prices for users with Janus-enabled players, at least with respect to tethered downloads. It seems unlikely that including unlimited tethered downloads in an “all-you-can-eat” subscription price can continue if Janus devices result in a significant drop-off in the sale of permanent downloads. It may be time to revisit the entire concept of tethered downloads, and Janus may present an opportunity (and justification) to alter the practice in a way that drives consumers more directly toward download purchases. If one believes that consumers do not wish to “rent” or “rent to buy” their music, it seems that it is only a matter of time until subscription models become a thing of the past. The wildly successful iTunes Music Store ' a permanent download-only model ' would certainly be one clear indication of this trend.

The more sensible approach, then, would probably be the introduction of a tiered-pricing model to mark up subscription pricing for users of Janus devices by some premium, and keeping permanent download pricing relatively constant. Early indications are that the premium may be in the 50%-100% range.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.