Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Reality TV Shows Difficult Concepts To Protect

By Andrew M. White and Lee S. Brenner
November 01, 2004

In the superheated competition of reality television programming, ownership of ideas is increasingly being disputed. For example, the legal battle between reality TV boxing shows “The Contender” and “The Next Great Champ” has proved to be more of a slugfest than anything going on in the ring. Household names from sports and entertainment – Oscar De La Hoya and Sylvester Stallone ' lined up on each side. Fox Broadcasting Co. produced “The Next Great Champ” and its opponent DreamWorks produced “The Contender” for NBC. Contender Partners LLC v. Fox Broadcasting Co., SC082599 (L.A. Super. Ct.). At the heart of the dispute has been the simple idea about boxers who compete in some fashion, with one man left standing at the season finale.

Allegations of idea theft will likely increase as the number of reality TV shows expands and the realm of truly novel ideas shrinks. Resolution of these cases could set new standards for ownership of ideas and the best ways of protecting those rights.

In fact, since the new wave of reality TV exploded on to the airwaves with “Survivor” in the summer of 2000, there has been a rash of lawsuits. They come in varying and sometimes unusual forms ' everything from injuries during filming, to people who are dragged unwillingly into hidden-camera shows and lawsuits alleging that programs were rigged and people were cheated out of prizes.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.