Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Where, as is generally the case, stock of a bankrupt company changes hands upon emergence, the company may undergo an “ownership change” and the use of its net operating losses (NOLs) may be subject to limitation under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (Code). This article discusses the loss limitation rules, in general, and one of the special rules under Section 382 of the Code that applies to bankrupt companies, specifically.
The impact of the loss limitation rules on a debtor company is critical for its advisers to understand because of the substantial value of its NOLs. In general, a debtor company's NOLs may represent its most valuable asset because of their potential to reduce cash taxes. Since application of the Section 382 loss limitation rules to a debtor company's NOLs may materially impact the value of its NOLs, it is important for advisers to search for the “Holy Grail,” ie, to determine whether the debtor company can qualify for the special Section 382 rule for bankrupt companies, Section 382(l)(5). If Section 382(l)(5) applies, there will be no limitation on the use of the debtor company's historical NOLs to reduce cash taxes on post-emergence income.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.