Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The recent developments in the creation and recognition of relationships among same-sex couples have developed a momentum which, like it or not – the recent laws passed by 13 states banning gay marriage, notwithstanding – must be recognized and understood by family lawyers and other related practitioners in the areas of tax, estate planning, adoption, and other financial and interpersonal disciplines. See Wilson R: The Changing and Conflicting State of Same-Sex Marriage. The Matrimonial Strategist, November 2004.
Like a snowball gathering speed and mass as it rolls down the hill, the body of law regarding same-sex relationships is developing and becoming significantly more intertwined in the day-to-day practices of a wide variety of legal and financial practitioners. The inevitable conclusion appears to be that the same rights and responsibilities afforded to straight couples shall be afforded to gay couples.
Although it is still unfamiliar and uncertain, the more that the same-sex couple issue becomes a part of our cultural milieu, ie, as it becomes less the headline and more the article buried on the sixth page, the experience of practitioners and clients alike with the generation of new laws and developments that expand the perspective of “family” will become part of our daily routines and practices. The law, and developments in social policy that shape the law, have begun to recognize a swing of the social pendulum: that which is most important is the nurturance and structure of the familial relationship, not the gender of the persons involved in that relationship.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?