Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When considering a new lease for a single use property, generally the tenant of the property will want to consider its “exit” strategies at the time of the initial negotiation of the lease. Potential “exit” strategies may include: assignment of the lease, early termination rights and options to purchase the property. The last on the list of these “exit” strategies, options to purchase the property, often creates substantial business issues for the landlord and tenant, as well as drafting issues for their legal representatives. As a result, certain conceptual issues, set forth and discussed below, should be addressed when drafting an option to purchase the property.
Purchase Price
An option to purchase is really a one-sided right; if the terms are favorable for the tenant at the time of exercise, the option will be exercised, and if the terms are not favorable at the applicable time for exercise, the option will not be exercised. As a result, from the tenant's perspective, the purchase price should be established in an absolute dollar amount, in order to allow the tenant to evaluate the value of the option. By contrast, the landlord would want the option expressed in terms of “market rate” at the time the option is exercised. While this “market rate” approach does provide the tenant with the right to purchase the property before any other person or entity, it does not provide the tenant with a sum certain to plan for the acquisition of the property. Therefore, the landlord and tenant should carefully consider what the option purchase price will be and include that specified amount in the lease document. In the event the lease contains multiple options to purchase the property that are exercisable at various points during the term of the lease, the option prices could be indexed up to reflect the rising costs, in order to take into account rising costs in the real estate market.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?