Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Five Reasons to Do a Trademark Audit

By Brenda Cotter
November 30, 2004

While a company's brands are among its most critical and valuable business assets, too little attention is usually devoted to identifying, developing, protecting and exploiting those assets. Gaps in trademark asset protection are often not discovered until a company seeks to enforce or is forced to defend its brands and encounters obstacles that could have been avoided.

In a recent interview, in-house counsel for a major company stated that what keeps him awake at night is wondering what he has missed ' what might happen that he has not foreseen. Conducting regular trademark audits (as well as audits for other intellectual property assets such as patents) is the best way to prevent that scenario for brand assets.

A trademark audit, in the broad sense, is simply intended to focus attention on the existing and potential trademark resources of a company. It can range from a yearly review managed internally to a full-blown comprehensive audit conducted by an outside law firm. A trademark audit allows a company to review, manage and fully exploit the value of trademark assets. It will generally include review and analysis of:

  • the existing trademark portfolio, including federal and state registrations and applications and the status of internet domain names;
  • strategic plans and business goals, with particular attention to new products or services or extensions of product lines;
  • internal procedures to identify and protect marks;
  • potential third-party infringements;
  • enforcement activities; and
  • identification of licensing opportunities.

Many companies choose an initial comprehensive trademark audit conducted by or with the assistance of outside counsel with a view toward managing the audit functions internally once an audit program is put in place. The key to successful management of trademark assets is simple ' the company must shift from a reactive position to devote singular attention to its trademark portfolio on a systematic basis.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?