Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Present-day real estate financing is significantly more complex than traditional financing. Sobered by borrower bankruptcies and compelled by rating agency requirements in the modern day era of mortgage securitizations, lenders are now looking to “mezzanine loans” to bridge the gap between senior debt and borrower equity. A mezzanine loan will often cover 50% to 90% of the equity required to acquire a property. In order to secure the repayment of a mezzanine loan, a lender customarily requires a pledge of the partnership or membership interests of the property owning entity.
In traditional mortgage transactions the borrower is required to obtain title insurance insuring the lender's mortgage lien on the real property. Ordinary title insurance is not available to the mezzanine lender because the collateral is not considered real property but rather a general intangible or investment property. The focus of this article is to explore the evolution of mezzanine financing and the various title insurance products available to the mezzanine lender in the current marketplace. Specifically, we look at the following forms of title insurance coverage: 1) the New York Insurance Rate and Service (TIRSA) Fairway Endorsement; 2) the TIRSA Non-Imputation Endorsement; 3) the TIRSA Mezzanine Financing Endorsement; and 4) the UCC Article 9 Insurance Policy.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.