Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Researchers and technology managers may not deal with IP every day like IP professionals do, but they are still exposed to all sorts of patent strategy tools, especially when they are attempting to develop a patent strategy for a business. The advertisements for these tools typically imply that life would be so much simpler if only they used the vendor's latest and greatest tool. Many of these tools are very useful; however, most tools also have limitations. Having a framework from which to evaluate these tools is therefore helpful to researchers and managers.
To help develop strategies, there are tools such as books on patent strategy, Web sites and computer software, and obviously, newsletters such as this one. The usefulness of these tools varies widely, based on the experience of the person using the tool and what “job” the person is trying to accomplish. For example, many books are written for the novice independent inventor and are therefore written on a very basic level, the concept of strategy being primarily how to obtain an enforceable patent. On the other hand, many newsletter articles are written for IP professionals and contain much more advanced advice. This advice may be excellent, but also may be too narrowly focused, such as covering some legal exception or nuance, to be incorporated into a broad patent strategy for a particular business.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.