Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court of Mississippi ruled that the heirs of the half-sister of blues musician Robert Johnson may proceed with their suit for ownership of the only two photographs of the legendary artist. Anderson v. LaVere, 2002-CA-00098-SCT.
Carrie Thompson, Johnson's half-sister, had collected the photos of Johnson. But a Mississippi circuit court dismissed for res judicata a suit over the photos by Thompson's half-sister and grandson on the ground that the heirs could have petitioned a state chancery court on the issue in an earlier proceeding that determined who was Johnson's biological son and heir.
Johnson died penniless and intestate in 1938. Thompson signed a contract in 1974 with music historian Stephen LaVere, a defendant in the current action, for use of the photos in exchange for 50% of the monies earned. Thompson died in 1983. In 1990, CBS Records (now owned by defendant Sony Music Entertainment) released Johnson's recordings. The album package included the photos.
Reversing and remanding the photos dispute for trial, the state Supreme Court stated: “The circuit court [in the current action] failed to recognize that the Thompson-LaVere contract specified that part of the property was owned by Thompson personally and part was owned by Thompson as heir [presumptive] to the Johnson estate. … Thus it appears that the circuit court never considered the possibility that the photos might not be the
property of the Johnson estate. … In fact, the chancery court [when earlier deciding the issue of who was Johnson's heir] made no finding concerning the copyright and the right to royalties generated from the two photos.”
In addition, current defendants Lavere and Sony Music hadn't been parties to the Johnson heir proceeding.
The Supreme Court of Mississippi ruled that the heirs of the half-sister of blues musician
Carrie Thompson, Johnson's half-sister, had collected the photos of Johnson. But a Mississippi circuit court dismissed for res judicata a suit over the photos by Thompson's half-sister and grandson on the ground that the heirs could have petitioned a state chancery court on the issue in an earlier proceeding that determined who was Johnson's biological son and heir.
Johnson died penniless and intestate in 1938. Thompson signed a contract in 1974 with music historian Stephen LaVere, a defendant in the current action, for use of the photos in exchange for 50% of the monies earned. Thompson died in 1983. In 1990, CBS Records (now owned by defendant
Reversing and remanding the photos dispute for trial, the state Supreme Court stated: “The circuit court [in the current action] failed to recognize that the Thompson-LaVere contract specified that part of the property was owned by Thompson personally and part was owned by Thompson as heir [presumptive] to the Johnson estate. … Thus it appears that the circuit court never considered the possibility that the photos might not be the
property of the Johnson estate. … In fact, the chancery court [when earlier deciding the issue of who was Johnson's heir] made no finding concerning the copyright and the right to royalties generated from the two photos.”
In addition, current defendants Lavere and Sony Music hadn't been parties to the Johnson heir proceeding.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.