Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part Two of a Two-Part Article
In our article that appeared in last month's Bankruptcy Strategist, we discussed the special rule contained in Section 382(l)(5) with respect to the use of net operating losses by a company that has restructured under the protection of the bankruptcy court. See “In Search of the Holy Grail, Musings on Section 382(l)(5)“, 22 The Bankruptcy Strategist Number 2, 1. As discussed in that article, Section 382(l)(5) requires a bankrupt corporation to meet special stock ownership rules which forces the bankrupt company to track the ownership of its stock and its “qualified indebtedness” (“old and cold” and “ordinary course” debt) in the hopes of preventing dispositions which might render Section 382(l)(5) inapplicable. Internal Revenue Service regulations ameliorate the harsh holding period rules with respect to “qualified indebtedness” by permitting some trading of such indebtedness, so long as a person who acquires debt that would otherwise qualify as “qualified indebtedness” does not wind up being a 5% shareholder under the plan of reorganization. Where the stock, debt and claims against a bankrupt company are traded, companies execute lock up agreements with their stockholders or request orders from the bankruptcy court to restrict trading in the stock, debt or claims so as to protect its net operating loss carry forwards. Often, out of an excess of caution, the orders requested have been overly broad and have disrupted trading in such debt and claims.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.