Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Index

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
December 27, 2004

Eminent Domain Law

Remediaton Costs Should Not Be Considered in Eminent Domain Valuation

Matter of City of New York v. Mobil Oil Corp.

* * *

Landlord & Tenant

DHCR May Permit Correction of Technical Defects in Tenants' PAR

Matter of 427 West 51st Street Owners Corp. v. DHCR

Tenant's Indemnification for Landlord's Negligence

Sterns Department Stores, Inc. v. Little Neck Dental

Landlord's Failure to Comply with HPD Regulations

Verdell v. Lincoln Amsterdam House, Inc.

Corporation, Not Individual Shareholders, Was Tenant Under Lease

150 Broadway N.Y. Associates v. Bodner

Landlord Not Entitled to Withdraw from Section 8 Program

M1849 LLC v. Inniss

Landlord Entitled to Withdraw from Section 8 Program

Cosmopolitan Associates, LLC v. Ortiz

Psychological Condition Does Not Warrant Pet Exemption

Matter of Contello Towers Corp.

* * *

Real Property Law

Neighbors Must Permit Access for Neighboring Construction

Matter of Rosma Development, LLC v. South

Eminent Domain Law

Remediaton Costs Should Not Be Considered in Eminent Domain Valuation

Matter of City of New York v. Mobil Oil Corp.

* * *

Landlord & Tenant

DHCR May Permit Correction of Technical Defects in Tenants' PAR

Matter of 427 West 51st Street Owners Corp. v. DHCR

Tenant's Indemnification for Landlord's Negligence

Sterns Department Stores, Inc. v. Little Neck Dental

Landlord's Failure to Comply with HPD Regulations

Verdell v. Lincoln Amsterdam House, Inc.

Corporation, Not Individual Shareholders, Was Tenant Under Lease

150 Broadway N.Y. Associates v. Bodner

Landlord Not Entitled to Withdraw from Section 8 Program

M1849 LLC v. Inniss

Landlord Entitled to Withdraw from Section 8 Program

Cosmopolitan Associates, LLC v. Ortiz

Psychological Condition Does Not Warrant Pet Exemption

Matter of Contello Towers Corp.

* * *

Real Property Law

Neighbors Must Permit Access for Neighboring Construction

Matter of Rosma Development, LLC v. South

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.