Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Employment Law StrategistKickerFeaturesSectionsNewsLJN Newsletters

Why Mediation Works

By Ruth D. Raisfeld
December 27, 2004

Employment lawyers are familiar with the following scenario: A client comes to you having received a letter from a lawyer representing a former employee. The client reports that the employee was fired for performance-related reasons after several years of employment. The client has a human resources manager, but the supervisor did not document the reasons for the termination. The employee's lawyer wants to discuss the terms of the separation and is suggesting that the employee was fired because she objected to harassment by the supervisor. The client is frustrated, feeling the company did everything possible for this employee who just didn't work out. However, the client has some reservations about the supervisor's own performance and isn't sure whether the supervisor's employment will last. The client asks you to take a look at the file and see if you have any ideas about how to respond to the demand letter.

One of the options savvy employment lawyers consider offering the client is to submit the dispute to mediation. In mediation, the employer and the former employee can sit down with each other and their lawyers, and with the help of a neutral third party, they can reach a resolution before either side incurs unnecessary legal fees, additional emotional wear-and-tear, and disruption of normal business activities. This article describes the process of mediation and why it works particularly well in employment matters.

This premium content is locked for LJN Newsletters subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Compliance Officers: Recent Regulatory Guidance and Enforcement Actions and Mitigating the Risk of Personal Liability Image

This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.