Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Constructing and Improving Space Protect Against Cost Surprises and Hidden Lease Issues
Many commercial office leases fail to identify or delineate all costs a tenant may incur in the initial build-out or subsequent alteration of its office space. Such costs, if not understood, negotiated upfront and documented in the lease agreement, will substantially reduce the actual dollars a tenant has available for its initial leasehold improvements from the landlord-provided tenant allowance and will increase the cost of alterations during the lease term. While not expressed in purely face-value economics, there are also many other issues which, if not addressed appropriately in the lease, will cost the tenant additional time and money. This article details some of these costs and issues and suggests ways to address them in your lease.
More often than not, problems encountered by the tenant in implementing leasehold improvement or alteration projects come from not having fully considered, discussed and recorded the rights, duties and responsibilities between the landlord and the tenant. It is the misunderstanding or discounting of their importance or the absence of language in the lease that generates unexpected costs and time delays for the tenant. Such silence is usually adverse to the tenant because the landlord can point to its standard operating procedures or general industry experience to pin these costs on the tenant.
As in any complex business matter, each variable discussed in this article should be measured and weighed in the context of the lease transaction and the primary goals and objectives of the tenant and the landlord.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?