Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Constructing and Improving Space Protect Against Cost Surprises and Hidden Lease Issues

By Elizabeth L. Cooper and Andrew G. Jones
December 30, 2004

Many commercial office leases fail to identify or delineate all costs a tenant may incur in the initial build-out or subsequent alteration of its office space. Such costs, if not understood, negotiated upfront and documented in the lease agreement, will substantially reduce the actual dollars a tenant has available for its initial leasehold improvements from the landlord-provided tenant allowance and will increase the cost of alterations during the lease term. While not expressed in purely face-value economics, there are also many other issues which, if not addressed appropriately in the lease, will cost the tenant additional time and money. This article details some of these costs and issues and suggests ways to address them in your lease.

More often than not, problems encountered by the tenant in implementing leasehold improvement or alteration projects come from not having fully considered, discussed and recorded the rights, duties and responsibilities between the landlord and the tenant. It is the misunderstanding or discounting of their importance or the absence of language in the lease that generates unexpected costs and time delays for the tenant. Such silence is usually adverse to the tenant because the landlord can point to its standard operating procedures or general industry experience to pin these costs on the tenant.

This premium content is locked for Commercial Leasing Law & Strategy subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.