Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Artist Death/Record Company's Claim
A record company couldn't proceed with a negligence claim against a video production company for the death of its primary artist during a video shoot, the Supreme Court of New York, Appellate Division, First Department, decided. Barry & Sons Inc. v. Instinct Productions LLC, 4714. The artist Aaliyah signed an agreement with Blackground Records. Blackground entered into an agreement with Instinct Productions for production of the music video “Rock the Boat.” Aaliyah died in an airplane crash that Instinct chartered during video production. Aaliyah's parents filed a wrongful death action in California against Instinct that was later settled. Blackground then sued Instinct. The New York trial court dismissed Blackground's claim for a declaratory judgment of failure to perform the video production contract, but allowed Blackground to proceed with a claim that Instinct's negligence resulted in severe harm and loss to the record company.
Reversing on the negligence claim, the appellate court ordered dismissal of the complaint on the ground that this was in effect a wrongful death action. Wrongful death actions are generally statutory rights. Under N.Y. Est. Powers & Trusts Law Sec. 5-4.1, such claims can only be brought by a personal representative of a decedent. The appellate court then reasoned: “The facile complaint allegation that Aaliyah was its primary asset does nothing to dispel the obvious ' that Blackground's claims assert nothing more than a wrongful death action. … Under Blackground's analysis, it is essentially asserting a claim for negligent interference with contractual relations, a theory of liability not recognized in New York.”
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.