Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The world's most populous country, China, is opening its door to foreign franchisors, in accordance with its WTO commitments. To accommodate this new reality, the Chinese government has published a new franchise regulation. On Dec. 31, 2004, the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) published Measures for the Regulation of Commercial Franchise Operations (the “Measures”).
The Measures will take effect on Feb. 1, 2005, and they will completely replace the previous regulatory system, under which a regulation issued in 1997 applied to domestic (Chinese) franchisors (the “Interim Measures”), with somewhat uncertain impact on foreign franchisors. The Measures also will supersede proposed Provisional Measures that were published for comment in Nov. 2004, which were to have applied to non-Chinese franchisors offering franchises through foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”). The new Measures will thus be the sole legal framework under which franchisors will operate in China, and they will apply to foreign and domestic franchisors.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.