Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The world's most populous country, China, is opening its door to foreign franchisors, in accordance with its WTO commitments. To accommodate this new reality, the Chinese government has published a new franchise regulation. On Dec. 31, 2004, the Ministry of Commerce (“MOFCOM”) published Measures for the Regulation of Commercial Franchise Operations (the “Measures”).
The Measures will take effect on Feb. 1, 2005, and they will completely replace the previous regulatory system, under which a regulation issued in 1997 applied to domestic (Chinese) franchisors (the “Interim Measures”), with somewhat uncertain impact on foreign franchisors. The Measures also will supersede proposed Provisional Measures that were published for comment in Nov. 2004, which were to have applied to non-Chinese franchisors offering franchises through foreign-invested enterprises (“FIEs”). The new Measures will thus be the sole legal framework under which franchisors will operate in China, and they will apply to foreign and domestic franchisors.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.