Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
<b>Decision of Note: </b>Music Downloader Loses Argument Based on Fair Use
The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled that a defendant who engaged in the unauthorized downloading of sound recordings from the Internet didn't have a viable fair-use defense. BMG Music v. Gonzalez, 03 C 6276. Several record companies sued Cecilia Gonzalez for downloading 30 songs onto her computer. Gonzalez claimed that the downloading constituted fair use under copyright law because she was listening to the recordings in order to decide whether to buy them. In rejecting the argument, the district court emphasized that; “the cumulative effect of direct infringers, like Gonzalez, harms the recording industry by reducing sales.”
To lower statutory damages, the defendant raised an innocent infringer defense under 17 U.S.C. Sec. 504(c)(2), claiming an issue of fact as to whether she had access to the plaintiffs' copyright notices. Denying this defense, the district court noted that under Sec. 402(d) of the Copyright Act, actual access isn't required, Rather, “plaintiff[s] need only show that the CDs with notice 'were in circulation [and] available' to the infringer. … [I]t is undisputed that the copyrights of the 30 songs at issue were properly noticed on the covers of the CDs.”
The court went on to issue an injunction ' though the defendant claimed to no longer have Internet access ' for the obvious reason that “[t]here is nothing, however, to stop her from reconnecting to the internet and resuming her infringement.”
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?