Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
I first started covering the U.S. Supreme Court just over 5 years ago. As measured in High Court years, that's barely a nanosecond-everything there moves glacially. But as measured in the life of the Internet, it's been an age; an age that's brought about some rather stunning changes.
One of the most striking aspects of Supreme Court coverage is how little it's changed over the centuries. Since televisions and recording devices are still barred from the Court, curious citizens must still rely largely on a cadre of print reporters to cover oral argument and summarize new decisions. Sketch artists' renderings of some usually fungible white male at a podium might accompany news reports in the really “big cases,” and television news trucks park outside the marble plaza to cover the press conferences that take place on the front steps when argument concludes. For the most part, however, news of the day in the courtroom comes filtered through the eyes and ears of the clutch of reporters permitted-with pen and pad and nothing else-inside the hallowed chambers.
The Internet is rapidly changing all that.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?