Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Supreme Court's Jan.12 decision in U.S. v. Booker, which made the federal Sentencing Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory, is likely to: 1) prove modest in its impact on sentences in the short run; 2) alter a bit the balance of power among prosecutors, defense attorneys and judges; and 3) spur Congress to make federal sentencing even more Draconian than it was for 2 decades under the mandatory Guidelines.
About the Decision
The decision, of questionable logic, is in two parts, with significantly different majorities answering the two questions presented. First, a 5-4 opinion by Justice Stevens held that disputed facts leading to enhanced sentences must be found by a jury beyond a reasonable doubt. (Under the Guidelines, such facts were found by the sentencing judge upon a preponderance of the evidence.) Second, the four dissenters to that proposition, joined by Justice Ginsberg, held in an opinion by Justice Breyer that the cure to the Constitutional defect perceived by the Stevens majority was to strike two provisions of the statute implementing the Guidelines. The excisions — 18 U.S.C. ' 3553(b)(1) and 18 U.S.C. ' 3742(e) — made the Guidelines advisory rather than mandatory and limited appellate review of sentences. Now, the courts of appeal no longer can substitute their own Guidelines calculation for the district courts'. Instead, they can reverse a sentence only if it's unreasonable in light of the purposes set forth in the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.