Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In April 2004, President Bush called for development of a nationwide electronic health records system that would include most Americans' health data within 10 years. He took some steps then to get the ball rolling, but funding for the program was cut in November as part of a plan to balance the federal budget. However, in the first months of 2005, Bush renewed his push for reforms, which he asserts will cut health care costs and reduce medical errors.
Bush created the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology, and in May 2004, David J. Brailer, MD, PhD, was appointed to the new position. In July 2004, then Health and Human Service Secretary Tommy Thompson launched the “Decade of Health Information Technology” with his agency's outline of a 10-year plan to transform health care with a new health information infrastructure, including electronic health records and a new network to link health records nationwide. The plan, prepared by Dr. Brailer, identified potential methods for encouraging the health care sector to adopt electronic records systems, because, according to the report, only 13% of hospitals reporting had any such system in 2002 and only 14% to 24% of physicians in practices did. These included regional grants to stimulate electronic record and community information exchange systems, low interest rate loans to set up such systems and Medicare reimbursement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.