Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Artist Liability for Audience Injuries

By Stan Soocher
March 29, 2005

In today's concert scene, high-energy music is often accompanied by audience members who engage in such physical, and sometimes dangerous, activities as crowd surfing, moshing and stage diving. What happens when a member of the audience is injured as a result of such conduct by another concertgoer?

The most recent court ruling on this issue involved the rock group Creed. Christa Harlow attended a 1998 show by Creed at the Webster Theatre in Hartford, CT. Harlow sustained face and head injuries when another concertgoer fell on her from the stage. She then filed a negligence suit in the Superior Court of Connecticut, Judicial District of New Haven, against the band members, the theater and others involved in producing the concert. The complaint alleged that the defendants had “permitted a highly dangerous and violent activity to persist, knew or should have known based on the genre of music and the typical behavior of its audiences that there was a strong likelihood that these dangerous activities would occur at the subject concert and place patrons, such as the plaintiff, at risk of injury.”

The band members moved for summary judgment. Harlow conceded that Creed had not controlled the theater and were not responsible for crowd control or providing security. On the issues of breach and causation, Creed argued that they hadn't engaged in unreasonable or dangerous conduct. The trial court, however, denied the band's summary judgment motion on the ground that there were material facts in dispute on this point. Harlow v. Cee-It-Live LLC, CV000270762S.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

The Benefits of Blockchain for e-Discovery and Data Preservation Image

As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.