Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

National Litigation Hotline

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
March 29, 2005

Complaint Need Not Be Amended Where Issues Actually Litigated

The Seventh Circuit has held that a Northrop Grumman Corp. employee whose federal complaint alleged age discrimination need not amend his complaint to include allegations of race discrimination, since such issues were actually litigated by the parties during the course of proceedings. Torry v. Northrop Grumman Corp., 2005 WL 502835 (7th Cir. Mar. 3)

Former Northrup Grumman employee Nancy Torry, an African-American, filed suit against her former employer, alleging violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA). Torry's complaint did not allege race discrimination, nor did Torry's attorney move to amend the complaint to add a claim under Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). However, as the Seventh Circuit noted on appeal, the parties actively litigated allegations with respect to race discrimination and “went through four years of discovery and other pretrial maneuverings without objecting to the fact that its opponent was patently engaged in endeavoring to prove racial as well as age discrimination.” In the federal trial court, Northrop Grumman contended that Torry's failure to amend her complaint effectively barred her from litigating her racial discrimination claims. The U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois ruled in favor of Torry, trying both the age discrimination and race discrimination claims. Torry did not prevail and appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.