Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Kansas Clinics Fighting for Patient Privacy
In a brief filed with Kansas' highest court last month, two clinics that offer abortion services outlined their case for overturning a District Judge's order that the clinics turn patient records over to the state Attorney General. Under a gag order imposed in October 2004, the clinics were not allowed to contact the patients in question. Their records are ostensibly being sought so that the State can determine if the patients were victims of statutory rape or if they sought late-term abortions prohibited by Kansas law. The clinics offered to turn the records over with names and identifying information redacted but they could run afoul of patient privacy laws if they turn records over that contain patient identifying information without first contacting the patients. On March 9, the gag order was lifted. Attorney General Phill Kline is an abortion opponent, but claims his purpose in obtaining the records is merely to fulfill his duty to prosecute crime.
No Reprieve for New Jersey Attorneys
A New Jersey judge refused on Feb. 18 to temporarily enjoin the State from collecting a $75 yearly assessment from attorneys to help defray the costs of malpractice insurance for New Jersey's medical practitioners. Judge Thomas Lyons of Union County, NJ, cited in his opinion to the danger that doctors might quit their practices if not granted some relief from the high costs of malpractice insurance coverage. Among other things, the judge deemed an injunction unnecessary to guard against irreparable harm because attorneys who pay the assessment now can get a refund later if the new rule is found unconstitutional.
Arizona Bill Scrapped
The Arizona state Senate dropped consideration of a bill that would have capped noneconomic damages in medical malpractice suits. In order to become law, a bill like this would have required a constitutional amendment, and legislators were uncertain they could muster enough support to get the constitution changed.
Florida's Amendment 7 on Hold, According to Judge
A Florida hospital in February won its challenge to the recently enacted Florida law that requires hospitals to make public adverse event reports. Plaintiffs in the suit sought information about a doctor who is being sued for malpractice. Pinellas Circuit Court Judge James Case found that the legislature had to clear up certain issues before plaintiffs suing doctors could employ the law to access hospital records.
Wyoming Bill Calls for Lawsuit-Screening Committee
Wyoming's House voted 57-2 to pass a bill sponsored by the state Joint Interim Committee that calls for establishment of a committee to help eliminate frivolous malpractice lawsuits. The group, to be made up of two attorneys, two doctors and one layperson, would look over suits before they could go to trial and offer their opinions. A similar committee operated in the state previously, but the state Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional in the 80s. The state's constitution has since been amended. The bill must now go to the state Senate for further action.
Proposal In Illinois for Separate Malpractice Court System
Illinois Republicans have proposed a bill that would set up a separate court system to handle medical malpractice litigation. Senate Bill 151, which would create the separate court system, was introduced Feb. 1, along with Related Senate Bill 150, which would cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases.
New York Times Report Challenges Notion That Lawsuits Drive Premium Rates
Reporters Joseph B. Treaster and Joel Brinkley reported in the Feb. 22 issue of The New York Times that contrary to President's Bush's frequent pronouncements of late, rising medical malpractice insurance premiums cannot be blamed largely on malpractice lawsuits. The true culprits, claim Treaster and Brinkley, are the insurance industry's declining investment returns and changes in the nature of competition in the industry. For instance, according to federal government and insurance industry data studied, insurance company costs rose steadily over the last decade while insurers raised premiums only minimally, if at all. They did this in order to attract more clients and gain more funds to reinvest in high-yield stocks and bonds. When the market faltered, insurers had to raise premiums dramatically to maintain profits.
Kansas Clinics Fighting for Patient Privacy
In a brief filed with Kansas' highest court last month, two clinics that offer abortion services outlined their case for overturning a District Judge's order that the clinics turn patient records over to the state Attorney General. Under a gag order imposed in October 2004, the clinics were not allowed to contact the patients in question. Their records are ostensibly being sought so that the State can determine if the patients were victims of statutory rape or if they sought late-term abortions prohibited by Kansas law. The clinics offered to turn the records over with names and identifying information redacted but they could run afoul of patient privacy laws if they turn records over that contain patient identifying information without first contacting the patients. On March 9, the gag order was lifted. Attorney General Phill Kline is an abortion opponent, but claims his purpose in obtaining the records is merely to fulfill his duty to prosecute crime.
No Reprieve for New Jersey Attorneys
A New Jersey judge refused on Feb. 18 to temporarily enjoin the State from collecting a $75 yearly assessment from attorneys to help defray the costs of malpractice insurance for New Jersey's medical practitioners. Judge Thomas Lyons of Union County, NJ, cited in his opinion to the danger that doctors might quit their practices if not granted some relief from the high costs of malpractice insurance coverage. Among other things, the judge deemed an injunction unnecessary to guard against irreparable harm because attorneys who pay the assessment now can get a refund later if the new rule is found unconstitutional.
Arizona Bill Scrapped
The Arizona state Senate dropped consideration of a bill that would have capped noneconomic damages in medical malpractice suits. In order to become law, a bill like this would have required a constitutional amendment, and legislators were uncertain they could muster enough support to get the constitution changed.
Florida's Amendment 7 on Hold, According to Judge
A Florida hospital in February won its challenge to the recently enacted Florida law that requires hospitals to make public adverse event reports. Plaintiffs in the suit sought information about a doctor who is being sued for malpractice. Pinellas Circuit Court Judge James Case found that the legislature had to clear up certain issues before plaintiffs suing doctors could employ the law to access hospital records.
Wyoming Bill Calls for Lawsuit-Screening Committee
Wyoming's House voted 57-2 to pass a bill sponsored by the state Joint Interim Committee that calls for establishment of a committee to help eliminate frivolous malpractice lawsuits. The group, to be made up of two attorneys, two doctors and one layperson, would look over suits before they could go to trial and offer their opinions. A similar committee operated in the state previously, but the state Supreme Court ruled it unconstitutional in the 80s. The state's constitution has since been amended. The bill must now go to the state Senate for further action.
Proposal In Illinois for Separate Malpractice Court System
Illinois Republicans have proposed a bill that would set up a separate court system to handle medical malpractice litigation. Senate Bill 151, which would create the separate court system, was introduced Feb. 1, along with Related Senate Bill 150, which would cap non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases.
Reporters Joseph B. Treaster and Joel Brinkley reported in the Feb. 22 issue of The
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
End of year collections are crucial for law firms because they allow them to maximize their revenue for the year, impacting profitability, partner distributions and bonus calculations by ensuring outstanding invoices are paid before the year closes, which is especially important for meeting financial targets and managing cash flow throughout the firm.
Law firms and companies in the professional services space must recognize that clients are conducting extensive online research before making contact. Prospective buyers are no longer waiting for meetings with partners or business development professionals to understand the firm's offerings. Instead, they are seeking out information on their own, and they want to do it quickly and efficiently.
Through a balanced approach that combines incentives with accountability, firms can navigate the complexities of returning to the office while maintaining productivity and morale.
The paradigm of legal administrative support within law firms has undergone a remarkable transformation over the last decade. But this begs the question: are the changes to administrative support successful, and do law firms feel they are sufficiently prepared to meet future business needs?
Counsel should include in its analysis of a case the taxability of the anticipated and sought after damages as the tax effect could be substantial.