Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Come 'Hell or High Water' NorVergence Causing a Stir over Documentation
So-called “hell or high water,” “waiver of defense” and lessor favorable “submission to jurisdiction” clauses have long been cornerstones of equipment finance documentation. But, the unfolding debacle over the last year involving a company called NorVergence has cast an unfavorable light on these important provisions and, in doing so, entangled most of the top players in the leasing industry.
NorVergence, Inc. was founded in 2001 by brothers Peter and Thomas Salzano. Within 2 years it had become a multi-million dollar telecommunications success story, generating revenues of more than $140 million in the year prior to its bankruptcy.
Headquartered in Newark, NJ, the company's main source of business was reselling telephone and Internet service that it purchased wholesale from such companies as Qwest Communications, Sprint Communications Co. LP and T-Mobile USA Inc. The NorVergence sales staff focused on offering deeply discounted telecommunications packages to small businesses throughout the country.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?