Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Indiana Attorney General Asks for Planned Parenthood Records
Echoing the controversy ignited recently when a Kansas prosecutor's attempt to gain access to abortion clinic records caused public outcry over patient privacy rights, Indiana Planned Parenthood went to court in March seeking temporary and permanent injunctions to prevent Indiana Attorney General Steve Carter from obtaining the confidential medical records of girls under the age of 14 who sought treatment at state family planning clinics. Carter, like Kansas' Attorney General Phill Kline before him, claims his purpose in seeking the records is merely to fulfill his duty to prosecute crimes such as rape and child molestation.
The legal mechanism being used by the Attorney General to access these private records is Medicaid law, which permits greater disclosure of private medical information than federal privacy laws that would normally allow if the records are needed for investigation of Medicaid fraud and abuse. Carter has already obtained similar records from three clinics and is attempting to access records from several other clinics. The Planned Parenthood lawsuit asks the court not only to enjoin the Attorney General from accessing any more records records, but also to order the return of records already taken.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.