Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Hotelier's Conviction for Tax Evasion Upheld
In United States v. Iskander, 2005 WL 1076545 (4th Cir. May 9, 2005), the defendant appealed his conviction on three counts of tax evasion and one count of structuring financial transactions to evade reporting requirements based on his role in skimming cash receipts and corporate checks received by two hotels he owned and operated.
The defendant controlled two corporations, each of which operated a hotel. At trial, it was shown that the defendant skimmed cash and credit card proceeds from the hotels and under-reported the hotels' gross receipts in an effort to conceal his diversion of funds. As a result of the scheme, the defendant deposited over $700,000 in corporate funds into his personal bank accounts. He also systematically structured the bank deposits below the $10,000 federal currency transaction reporting requirements. Finally, the defendant failed to pay either personal or corporate income tax on the funds. Instead, he used the underreported gross receipts amount for his corporate tax return, which not only led to no tax being paid for the hotels' business, but also led him to “write off” alleged loans made to the hotel as “bad” uncollectible debt.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?