Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Seizure Drug Labels Warn of New Dangers
In a letter sent April 18, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) notified health care professionals about revisions to the “Warnings” and “Precautions” sections of the prescribing information for Trileptal'(oxcarbazepine) tablets and oral suspension. Trileptal is used for treatment of partial seizures in adults and children ages 4-16 years with epilepsy. The updated “Warnings” section describes serious dermatological reactions, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), that have been reported in both children and adults in association with Trileptal use. The “Precautions” section was updated to warn of multi-organ hypersensitivity reactions that some users of Trileptal have reported experiencing.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.